2019- What might the playoffs look like if the old system was still used?

This is obviously a guess, because for those divisions with three leagues, we wouldn't be able to determine which league would get two teams. For this model, I gave the lowest rated league two teams. The others would get three each. *= Did not make playoffs under format actually used. DIVISION I (8 teams) (DL and SFL, 3 teams each) (TCAL: 2 teams) DL 3: Jesuit-Carmichael (4-2, 5-5) @ SFL 1: Folsom (6-0, 9-1) SFL 3: Oak Ridge-El Dorado Hills (4-2, 7-2) @ TCAL 1: St. Mary's-Stockton (5-0, 5-5) DL 2: Cosumnes Oaks-Elk Grove (4-2, 7-3) @ TCAL 2: Lincoln-Stockton (4-1, 9-1) SFL 2: Rocklin (4-2, 7-3) @ DL 1: Davis (5-1, 9-1) DIVISION II (8 teams) (Each league gets 2 teams) SJAA 2: Bear Creek-Stockton* (4-1, 4-6) @ CVC 1: Inderkum-Sacramento (6-0, 10-0) ML 2: Laguna Creek-Elk Grove* (4-1, 7-3) @ CCAL 1: Turlock (5-0, 8-2) CCAL 2: Downey-Modesto (4-1, 7-3) @ SJAA 1: Edison-Stockton (5-0, 9-1) CVC 2 Yuba City (4-2, 6-4) @ ML 1: Monterey Trail-Elk Grove (5-0, 9-1) DIVISION III (16 teams) Note: In the old system, division I had 16 teams. However, it also had the most leagues. Currently, division III has the most leagues. That is why I gave this division 16 teams in my model. Like the old system, though, there would be a north and a south and those winners would meet in the championship. North (CAL and FVL 3 teams each) (MEL 2 teams) CAL 3:Christian Brothers-Sacramento (4-2, 7-3) @ FVL 1:Placer-Auburn (5-0, 8-2) FVL 3: Ponderosa-Shingle Springs (2-3, 5-5) @ MEL 1: Vacaville (5-0, 8-2) CAL 2:Vista del Lago-Folsom (5-1,8-2) @ MEL 2: Vanden-Fairfield (4-1, 5-5) FVL 2:Rio Linda (4-1, 8-2) @ CAL 1:Capital Christian-Sacramento (6-0, 8-2) South (Each league gets 4 teams) VOL 4: Sierra-Manteca (3-3, 7-3) @ CCC 1: Buhach Colony-Atwater (6-0, 10-0) CCC 3: Merced (4-2, 5-5) @ VOL 2: Oakdale (5-1, 7-3) VOL 3: Central Catholic-Modesto (5-1, 5-5) @ CCC 2: Atwater (4-2, 7-3) CCC 4: Patterson (3-3, 6-4) @ VOL 1: Manteca (5-1, 8-2) DIVISION IV (8 teams) (GEL and WAC get 3 teams each) (GSL gets 2) WAC 3: Johansen-Modesto* (5-2, 7-3) @ GEL 1: Casa Roble-Orangevale (5-0, 7-3) GEL 3: Dixon* (3-2, 6-4) @ GSL 1: Johnson-Sacramento (4-0, 8-2) WAC 2: Los Banos (5-2, 5-5) @ GSL 2: Valley-Sacramento* (3-1, 4-6) GEL 2: Woodland (4-1, 7-3) @ WAC 1: Beyer-Modesto (6-1, 6-4) DIVISION V (2 teams each) (Note: There might be a possibility of north vs. south here, too. If so, it would be SVC vs. PVL and MLL vs. TVL) SVC 2: Rosemont-Sacramento (3-2, 7-2) @ TVL 1: Ripon (5-1, 9-1) MLL 2: Sonora (4-1, 5-5) @ PVL 1: Center-Antelope (5-0, 9-0) TVL 2: Escalon (5-1, 9-1) @ MLL 1: Amador-Sutter Creek (4-1, 9-1) PVL 2: Colfax (4-1, 7-3) @ SVC 1: Bradshaw Christian-Sacramento (5-0, 8-2) DIVISION VI (3 teams each) SDL 3: Highlands-North Highlands (3-2, 8-2) @ SL 2: Denair (6-1, 8-2) winner @ SDL 1: Golden Sierra-Garden Valley (5-0, 8-2) SL 3: Mariposa (5-2, 6-4) @ SDL 2: Linden (4-1, 7-3) winner @ SL 1: Ripon Christian (7-0, 9-1) DIVISION VII (2 teams each) CCAA 2: Stone Ridge Christian-Merced* (3-1, 6-4) @ SMAL 1: Woodland Christian (5-0, 8-2) SMAL 2: Encina-Sacramento* (3-2, 3-6) @ CCAA 1: Big Valley-Modesto (4-0, 6-4) Teams that actually made playoffs that would have missed in the old format Antelope Bear River-Grass Valley Calaveras-San Andreas Del Campo-Fair Oaks Del Oro-Loomis Elk Grove Golden Valley-Merced Granite Bay Gregori-Modesto Hilmar Hughson Kimball-Tracy LeGrand Liberty Ranch-Galt Lincoln Livingston Nevada Union-Grass Valley Oakmont-Roseville Pleasant Grove-Elk Grove River Valley-Yuba City Tracy Union Mine-El Dorado Vacaville Christian Western Sierra-Rocklin Whitney-Rocklin